<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple Inheritance in Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and photos from an American living in Spain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:14:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-5195</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/#comment-5195</guid>
		<description>I can think of a half a dozen occasions I&#039;ve wished for MI in the past few months.  Many of the interface hacks I&#039;ve had to use instead left a bad taste in my mouth.  It&#039;s a shame that I know what I WANT to do and are not allowed to.

I like this solution.  The only complaint I have about it is that it doesn&#039;t allow you to inject a different implementation for the interface implementation class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can think of a half a dozen occasions I&#8217;ve wished for MI in the past few months.  Many of the interface hacks I&#8217;ve had to use instead left a bad taste in my mouth.  It&#8217;s a shame that I know what I WANT to do and are not allowed to.</p>
<p>I like this solution.  The only complaint I have about it is that it doesn&#8217;t allow you to inject a different implementation for the interface implementation class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online keno games</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>online keno games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>The lack of multiple inheritence is a blessing not a curse,and it should be embraced.In a decade of using java &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onlinekenogames.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;online keno games&lt;/a&gt;I have only one time encountered need for multiple inheritance, and a tiny bit of typing allowed me to use interfaces to eliminate the problem.People should pull out things like the reflection API as a last resort, and should be prepared to resign the next day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of multiple inheritence is a blessing not a curse,and it should be embraced.In a decade of using java <a href="http://www.onlinekenogames.net" rel="nofollow">online keno games</a>I have only one time encountered need for multiple inheritance, and a tiny bit of typing allowed me to use interfaces to eliminate the problem.People should pull out things like the reflection API as a last resort, and should be prepared to resign the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/#comment-744</guid>
		<description>An &quot;Add-In&quot; for an IDE?  Which IDE?

Anyway, I look forward to seeing what you come up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An &#8220;Add-In&#8221; for an IDE?  Which IDE?</p>
<p>Anyway, I look forward to seeing what you come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johanatan</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>johanatan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/#comment-743</guid>
		<description>P.S.  I wouldn&#039;t call this a &#039;flaw&#039; either.  It&#039;s more of a deficiency.  But, I&#039;m currently working on the Add-In that I hoped would fill in the gap.  I&#039;ll post a link to it when it&#039;s done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I wouldn&#8217;t call this a &#8216;flaw&#8217; either.  It&#8217;s more of a deficiency.  But, I&#8217;m currently working on the Add-In that I hoped would fill in the gap.  I&#8217;ll post a link to it when it&#8217;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johanatan</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>johanatan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2006/10/23/multiple-inheritance-in-java/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a dogmatic C++ programmer, but I do enjoy having the option to use multiple inheritance.  It saves you from having to &#039;wrap&#039; all your method calls to the inner static.  And, also you aren&#039;t limited to using a static (i.e., your example could have had and used members in the interface).  Of course, multiple inheritance can be abused, but &#039;with great power comes great responsibility&#039;.

It would be really nice if there was a wrapper generator (i.e. macro) in the IDE for this sort of multiple inheritance workaround (or for the containment approach).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a dogmatic C++ programmer, but I do enjoy having the option to use multiple inheritance.  It saves you from having to &#8216;wrap&#8217; all your method calls to the inner static.  And, also you aren&#8217;t limited to using a static (i.e., your example could have had and used members in the interface).  Of course, multiple inheritance can be abused, but &#8216;with great power comes great responsibility&#8217;.</p>
<p>It would be really nice if there was a wrapper generator (i.e. macro) in the IDE for this sort of multiple inheritance workaround (or for the containment approach).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
