Comments on: Porous Pachyderm http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/ Thoughts and photos from an American living in Spain. Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:12:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Erik R. http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/#comment-2227 Erik R. Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:01:46 +0000 http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pacaderm/#comment-2227 No. We are completely petless*, which some people find odd, considering that my wife is a veterinarian. *I don't think <a href="http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/projects/cactus-cam/" rel="nofollow">Spike</a> counts. No. We are completely petless*, which some people find odd, considering that my wife is a veterinarian.

*I don’t think Spike counts.

]]> By: aquariumdrinker http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/#comment-2226 aquariumdrinker Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:51:33 +0000 http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pacaderm/#comment-2226 Speaking of aquarium drinking, hast thou an aquarium? They are wonderful smelly fun. Speaking of aquarium drinking, hast thou an aquarium? They are wonderful smelly fun.

]]> By: Erik R. http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/#comment-2225 Erik R. Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:30:40 +0000 http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pacaderm/#comment-2225 Good work, Mr. AquariumDrinker. You're definitely on the right track. It's not a CRT. Good work, Mr. AquariumDrinker. You’re definitely on the right track.

It’s not a CRT.

]]> By: aquariumdrinker http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/#comment-2224 aquariumdrinker Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:14:39 +0000 http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pacaderm/#comment-2224 I like the idea of it being a CRT, so if not a monitor, perhaps an older TV? Assuming the white balance setting on the image fairly accurately reproduces the color, the bluish specular highlights remind me of the glow TVs cast. Also, the lighting is soft enough that I think probably the the light source is either big (bigger than a bulb, anyway) or moving. (Do I get credit for showing my work?) I like the idea of it being a CRT, so if not a monitor, perhaps an older TV? Assuming the white balance setting on the image fairly accurately reproduces the color, the bluish specular highlights remind me of the glow TVs cast. Also, the lighting is soft enough that I think probably the the light source is either big (bigger than a bulb, anyway) or moving. (Do I get credit for showing my work?)

]]> By: Erik R. http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/#comment-2223 Erik R. Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:35:30 +0000 http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pacaderm/#comment-2223 Doh! Thanks for that, Simon. So much for using google searches as a spellchecker. Not a computer monitor. Good guess, though. Doh! Thanks for that, Simon. So much for using google searches as a spellchecker.

Not a computer monitor. Good guess, though.

]]> By: simon http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pachyderm/#comment-2222 simon Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:31:15 +0000 http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2008/03/19/porous-pacaderm/#comment-2222 Lightsource - your computer monitor? BTW, it's "pachyderm". Lightsource - your computer monitor?
BTW, it’s “pachyderm”.

]]>