<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Brown&#8217;s The Lost Symbol is Anti-Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and photos from an American living in Spain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:20:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik R.</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5115</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5115</guid>
		<description>Nice try, Escorpiuser.  As I know you are a Spaniard, I will explain this with Spanish.  This is the difference between &lt;em&gt;ser&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;estar&lt;/em&gt; in English.  It comes up rarely (I never noticed it until just this moment!), but it&#039;s there.  &quot;Opened&quot;, when used as a past-participle (e.g. &quot;I have opened my mind.&quot;), implies action, therefore it would use &lt;em&gt;ser&lt;/em&gt;, i.e. &lt;em&gt;ser abierto&lt;/em&gt;.  But &quot;open&quot;, as a past participle, is a &lt;em&gt;state of being&lt;/em&gt;, in which case it would use &lt;em&gt;estar&lt;/em&gt;, i.e. &lt;em&gt;estar abierto&lt;/em&gt;.  Both of these are past participles (as I understand the concept), but &quot;opened&quot; doesn&#039;t work for &quot;minded&quot;, which is a state of being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try, Escorpiuser.  As I know you are a Spaniard, I will explain this with Spanish.  This is the difference between <em>ser</em> and <em>estar</em> in English.  It comes up rarely (I never noticed it until just this moment!), but it&#8217;s there.  &#8220;Opened&#8221;, when used as a past-participle (e.g. &#8220;I have opened my mind.&#8221;), implies action, therefore it would use <em>ser</em>, i.e. <em>ser abierto</em>.  But &#8220;open&#8221;, as a past participle, is a <em>state of being</em>, in which case it would use <em>estar</em>, i.e. <em>estar abierto</em>.  Both of these are past participles (as I understand the concept), but &#8220;opened&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work for &#8220;minded&#8221;, which is a state of being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escorpiuser</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>Escorpiuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>What about &quot;opened-minded&quot;??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about &#8220;opened-minded&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brown fan</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brown fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>Very nice., I like the review but I already have read the book and I must say I like the plot in Angels and Deamons a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice., I like the review but I already have read the book and I must say I like the plot in Angels and Deamons a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secrets of The Lost Symbol</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator>Secrets of The Lost Symbol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5099</guid>
		<description>Hi Erik

Some very interesting thoughts! 

Would you mind getting in touch?

SOLS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Erik</p>
<p>Some very interesting thoughts! </p>
<p>Would you mind getting in touch?</p>
<p>SOLS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escorpiuser</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5089</link>
		<dc:creator>Escorpiuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5089</guid>
		<description>Wow! What a scientific and analytic mind, Erik...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! What a scientific and analytic mind, Erik&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5088</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5088</guid>
		<description>Damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik R.</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5083</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5083</guid>
		<description>What are you, a bloody English teacher?  I agree completely. It should be the past participle, &quot;closed&quot;.  To be honest, I tried them both without a hyphen (eventually this word will no longer need the hyphen, as is the nature of compound word evolution), but the spellchecker disliked them both.  You are very right.  My proof reader is going to get a pay cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you, a bloody English teacher?  I agree completely. It should be the past participle, &#8220;closed&#8221;.  To be honest, I tried them both without a hyphen (eventually this word will no longer need the hyphen, as is the nature of compound word evolution), but the spellchecker disliked them both.  You are very right.  My proof reader is going to get a pay cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondraussie</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5081</link>
		<dc:creator>mondraussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5081</guid>
		<description>gawd erik... as usual you do my head in! some of what you said my poor little brain fumbles towards in half formed thoughts... but i could never take it to the logical extremes that you do! 

but one commment.... is it &quot;close-minded&quot; or &quot;closed-minded&quot;? I would have gone for &quot;closed-minded&quot; myself (as in &quot;closed&quot; being the adjective that is the opposite of &quot;open&quot; - the door is closed/ the door is open) but i welcome alternative opinions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gawd erik&#8230; as usual you do my head in! some of what you said my poor little brain fumbles towards in half formed thoughts&#8230; but i could never take it to the logical extremes that you do! </p>
<p>but one commment&#8230;. is it &#8220;close-minded&#8221; or &#8220;closed-minded&#8221;? I would have gone for &#8220;closed-minded&#8221; myself (as in &#8220;closed&#8221; being the adjective that is the opposite of &#8220;open&#8221; &#8211; the door is closed/ the door is open) but i welcome alternative opinions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5076</link>
		<dc:creator>andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5076</guid>
		<description>Hi! I&#039;m from Minneapolis and I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever had someone tell me to watch out for the Devil. Maybe on Halloween.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I&#8217;m from Minneapolis and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever had someone tell me to watch out for the Devil. Maybe on Halloween.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>Here in the Charlotte area the Devil is an active player in popular religious teachings. I think when people have been taught to be on constant look-out for the Devil in all his (I&#039;m pretty sure the Devil isn&#039;t female) various forms, the chances of being worried enough about the evolutionists to keep your kids from listening to an atheist play a guitar are much greater than in, say, Minneapolis, where the Devil is more likely to be viewed as a metaphor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in the Charlotte area the Devil is an active player in popular religious teachings. I think when people have been taught to be on constant look-out for the Devil in all his (I&#8217;m pretty sure the Devil isn&#8217;t female) various forms, the chances of being worried enough about the evolutionists to keep your kids from listening to an atheist play a guitar are much greater than in, say, Minneapolis, where the Devil is more likely to be viewed as a metaphor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
